Karnataka High Court Advocates for Uniform Civil Code in Landmark Judgment

The Karnataka High Court in one of its important judgments stressed the need for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). This judgment was given in the context of a property dispute, in which Justice Sanjeev kumar presented his views saying that it is very important to implement a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) to promote equality, justice and secularism in India.

Uniform Civil Code and Indian Constitution

Main Reason for UCC
The Karnataka High Court stressed the need for UCC because many religious personal laws have differences and justice based on the religion or gender of the person. Justice Sanjiv Kumar said that UCC can remove such legal differences which are based on religion or gender. He also said that if UCC is implemented then it will be in consonance with the constitutional principles like equality, secularism and justice, which are given in the preamble of the Indian Constitution.

Relation of Article 44 of the Constitution
Article 44 of the Constitution states in the Directive Principles of State Policy that a Uniform Civil Code will provide equal law for all citizens, irrespective of their religion or caste. Justice Sanjiv Kumar said that Article 44 is a roadmap designed to adopt the principle of equality, and it can help eliminate differences brought about by religious laws.

Dispute of Abdul Bashir Khan’s heirs

The context of this judgment was a property dispute between the heirs of Abdul Bashir Khan. The dispute was against the division of family property, in which girls were also given the right of inheritance. Justice Sanjeev Kumar said in this judgment that the difference in inheritance rights in different religious laws often disadvantages women.

By upholding the decision of the Bengaluru trial court, which gave equal rights to the heirs of Shahnaz Begum, Justice Sanjeev Kumar proved that it is possible to achieve equality if the law is according to a uniform system. Such a judgment shows that even more equitable results can be achieved if there is a uniform law instead of religious personal laws.

Cross-objection and legal effect
Sirajuddin Macki’s cross-objection, which was about the division of property under personal law, was rejected by the court. The High Court said that the property should be divided according to justice and equality, which is possible according to the Uniform Civil Code.

Personal law and gender equality

Comparative analysis of Hindu and Muslim personal law
The court in its judgment raised differences between Hindu and Muslim personal laws, especially in the matter of women’s rights. For example, daughters have the right to inheritance under Hindu law, while the rights of daughters are quite limited under Muslim law, which is often influenced by outdated and patriarchal interpretations of religious texts.

Justice Sanjiv Kumar said that such differences are against the principle of equality under Article 14. He also said that if the UCC comes into force, every woman will get equal legal rights irrespective of her religion or caste.

Personal law and abnormal treatment
The court also said that religious personal laws often promote gender equality. Whether it is property rights, marriage laws or divorce arrangements, women often face injustice, which arises from outdated patriarchal thinking. Justice Sanjiv Kumar said that all women are equal citizens under the Constitution and they should get equal treatment before the law.

Towards Secularism and Equality
Relation of Principles of Fraternity and Equality
Justice Sanjeev Kumar in his judgment also supported the principles of fraternity and equality given in the Preamble of the Constitution. He said that the Uniform Civil Code will strengthen the democratic and secular principles of India and promote the unity of the country, as well as respect our vibrancy.

Views of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Justice Sanjeev Kumar also recalled the views of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar which he gave in the Constituent Assembly. He said that Dr. Ambedkar always explained the importance of a uniform law and expressed his views against personal laws. This view of Ambedkar was clearly seen in his judgment.

Opposition and Challenges on Uniform Civil Code
Implementing the Uniform Civil Code will not be easy, as it will face opposition due to India’s cultural diversity and the existence of many religious personal laws. Many religious groups say that the Uniform Civil Code will affect their religious freedom, which is their right under Article 25. Thus, maintaining a balance between equality and religious freedom will be a big challenge.

Gender Justice and Uniform Civil Code

Equal treatment for women

The Karnataka High Court said that if the Uniform Civil Code is implemented, it can eliminate discrimination among women. Women will get the right to equal law under all religions, which they have not been able to get till now due to many religious laws.

Strengthening democratic and religious neutrality
Justice Sanjeev Kumar said that the Uniform Civil Code will strengthen democratic principles and promote religious neutrality. This will ensure that every citizen will get equal treatment before the law and the influence of religion on the law will be reduced.

Important step for future legal discussions

This decision of the Karnataka High Court on personal laws and gender equality can become an important precedent in many legal cases in the future. This decision will become an inspiration for law reform and shows the possibility of moving forward towards such laws and legal systems that will promote equality and justice.

Support to Constitutional Values

This judgment of Justice Sanjiv Kumar is a strong support for the implementation of Uniform Civil Code, which is essential for the constitutional values ​​of equality, justice and secularism. This judgment, which removes the inequalities existing for women in personal law and suggests a uniform legal system, is an important step in the legal thinking of India.

Also Read : Global Protests Against Trump: A Closer Look

Join Us : Facebook